Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94259 (PNJ)

VIKKI KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. UT OF CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

CRWP/9120/2025 · 2025-08-22

Subhas Mehla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-9120-2025 (O&M) 1 110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-9120-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.08.2025 VIKKI KUMAR AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners Versus UT OF CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. A.S. Gulati, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ankur Bali, Addl.P.P. U.T., Chandigarh. **** SUBHAS MEHLA , J (Oral): 1. The prayer in the instant criminal writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful lives at the behest of respondents No.4 to 5. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he would be satisfied if the representation dated 20.08.2025 (Annexure P-5) be looked into by the competent authority in accordance with law. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Ankur Bali, Addl.P.P. U.T., Chandigarh, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-U.T., Chandigarh and submitted that on representation of the petitioners, the competent authority will take action as per law. 5. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to take a decision on the representation dated 20.08.2025 (Annexure P-5) submitted on behalf of the petitioners in accordance with law. (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 22.08.2025 monika 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes /No 2. Whether reportable : Yes /No MONIKA RANI 2025.08.22 17:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document