HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11069 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "issue an order directing the court below to expedite and hear the temporary injunction application and pass appropriate order at the temporary application (Paper No.6-G) pending before learned Civil Judge (Senior Division). Court No.18, Deoria vide O.S. No.18 of 2025 (Hriday Narain Singh and another Vs. Vijay Bahadur Singh and others) within stipulated period." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division). Court No.18, Deoria to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vashishtha Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : Hriday Narain Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) Vijay Bahadur Singh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 17, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 11069 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad