HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 3158 of 2025 Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. This petition purportedly in public interest has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondent nos. 1 & 2 for constituting an enquiry committee headed by the Collector, Ghazipur for submitting a report before this Court and directing the respondents to take action on the said enquiry report. 2. A perusal of the petition indicates that two representations by one Shamshad Khan, who was past member of the Nagar Panchayat, Dildarnagar, District - Ghazipur, sent on 30.11.2023 to the Tehsildar by registered post, certain communication dated 13.09.2022 addressed by Nagar Panchayat, Dildarnagar, District - Ghazipur to the SHO, P.S. Dildarnagar, Ghazipur and an order dated 21.09.2022 passed by the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Dildarnagar, District - Ghazipur, wherein reference has been made to some orders passed by this Court have been produced by the petitioner, claiming himself to be the National President of Ex-Serviceman Welfare Registered Organization. 3. The petitioner has failed to indicate as to once the representations were sent by one Shamshad Khan, and some orders pursuant to the directions of the Court had been passed, as to in what manner, the petitioner became interested and took up the matter purportedly in public interest. 4. The documents annexed with the petition, are either not readable and/or typed copies have several gaps and nothing can be deciphered from what Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Chandra Srivastava, Yadvendra Rai Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Jagdish Pathak, S.C. Sita Ram Gupta .....Petitioner(s) The State of U.P. and 3 others .....Respondent(s) has been produced in the nature of a typed copy of the order. The reference to certain orders passed by the High Court have also been made, however, the petitioner apparently has not cared to find out the said orders and indicate the reference thereof. 5. In view of the above fact situation looking to the nature of cursory and laconic petition, the same cannot be entertained. The same is, therefore, dismissed. October 9, 2025 nd WPIL No. 3158 of 2025 2 (Kshitij Shailendra, J) (Arun Bhansali, CJ) Digitally signed by :- NISITH DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad