IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MP(M) No. 591 of 2025 Date of Decision : 20.03.2025 Aman Singh Thakur ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate. For the respondent/State : Mr. Prashant Sen, Deputy Advocate General. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Prashant Sen, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent-State. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that in view of the fact that notice under Section 41(A) of Cr.P.C. has been issued and the arrest of the person is not required, he wants to withdraw the present petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 20th March, 2025 (Chander)