Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94224 (ALL)

ASHOK KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/3275/2025 · 2025-09-10

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 3275 of 2025 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 2. By means of this application, the only prayer made by the applicant is that a direction be issued to the court concerned to decide the Case No. 6440 of 2020 (Ashok Kumar Vs Rajesh Kumar Kesri), under Section 138 N.I. Act, Police Station- Kotwali, District- Jaunpur, pending in the court of Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) Court No.10, Jaunpur, expeditiously within a short stipulated period. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has filed a complaint under Section 138 of N.I. Act in the year 2020 but the same has not been decided so far due to which, applicant is suffering irreparable loss. Learned counsel further submits that a direction may be issued to the concerned Court to decide the same within specific time. 4. Considering the facts of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the applicant's case, this application U/s 529 B.N.S.S. is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties as expeditiously as possible, if there is no legal impediment. September 11, 2025 Krishna*/A Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rohit Kumar Pandey, Sunil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.) Ashok Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad