MS DHARMINDER KUMAR ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS v. THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
ARB/492/2024 · 2025-05-20
Jagmohan Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94221 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94221 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
`
ARB-492-2024
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
277
ARB-492-2024 Date of Decision: 20.05.2025 M/s Dharminder Kumar Engineers and Contractors …Applicant Versus State of Punjab and others
…Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. R.K. Girdhar, Advocate Ms. Kashakdeep Kaur, Advocate and Ms. Kirandeep Kaur, Advocate for the applicant
Mr. Chanchal K. Singla, Additional Advocate General, Punjab *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1.
Through instant application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short ‘1996 Act’), the applicant is seeking appointment of an Arbitrator.
2.
Pursuant to tender, the applicant was allotted work by respondent vide letter dated 26.03.2021 (Annexure A-1). Thereafter, an agreement dated 07.04.2021 (Annexure A-3) was executed between the parties. A dispute erupted between the parties. The applicant served notice upon the respondent seeking resolution of dispute through Arbitral Tribunal but to no avail.
3.
Reply by way of affidavit dated 17.05.2025 of Er. Ishan Kaushal, Executive Engineer, Water Supply and Sanitation Division, MOHIT KUMAR 2025.05.20 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgement.
`
ARB-492-2024
-2- Fatehgarh Sahib filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 5 is taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at an appropriate place.
4.
Learned State counsel submits that there was lapse on the part of the applicant, thus, it is not entitled to the claimed amount. The applicant has further not followed the prescribed procedure. It was required to first approach the department.
5.
Learned counsel for the applicant pointed out that the applicant had approached the authorities and left with no other option, invoked the arbitration clause.
6.
Conditions to invoke power conferred by Section 11(6) of 1996 Act stand satisfied, thus, I hereby appoint a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.
7.
Mr. Manu Loona, Advocate, residing at House No.212, Sector 15, Panchkula, Mobile No.9803100065 is hereby appointed as a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties, subject to compliance of statutory requirements. The learned Arbitrator is requested to comply with mandate of Section 12 of 1996 Act before proceeding further.
8.
The parties at the first instance will appear before the Arbitrator on 04.06.2025 at 10.00 A.M. and thereafter, as directed by learned Arbitrator.
9.
The Arbitrator shall be paid fee in accordance with the Fourth Schedule of the 1996 Act, as amended.
10.
The Arbitrator is requested to complete the proceedings as per time limit specified under Section 29-A of the 1996 Act.
MOHIT KUMAR 2025.05.20 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgement.
`
ARB-492-2024
-3-
11.
Needless to mention, parties would be at liberty to raise all the claims/defences/counter claims/pleas before the Arbitrator. Any observation made hereinabove will not be binding on the learned Arbitrator.
12.
A request letter along with copy of this order be sent to Mr. Manu Loona.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE 20.05.2025 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
MOHIT KUMAR 2025.05.20 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgement.