Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9422 (JHR)

DYA PAYAN DUTTA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

W.P.(Cr.)/228/2024 · 2025-03-05

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No. 228 of 2024 ------ 1. Dya Payan Dutta, aged about 50 years, son of Debi Prasad Dutta, resident of P-97B, Lake Terrace, Sarat Bose Road, P.O.-Kolkata, P.S.-Lake Market, Dist. 24 Sough Parganas, West Bengal 2. Gaurav Atha, aged about 42 years, son of Kishore Atha, resident of 14 Sarat Bose Road, P.O.-Kolkata, P.S.- Bhowinpore, Dist. 24 Parganas, West Bengal 3. Vishal Atha, aged about 42 years, son of Dilip Atha, resident of 14 Sarat Bose Road, P.O.-Kolkata, P.S.- Bhowinpore, Dist. 24 Parganas, West Bengal 4. South Mishra, aged about 42 years, son of Jagdish Misra, resident of Silver Spring, P.O.-Kolkata, P.S.-Tangra, Dist.24 South Parganas, West Bengal 5. Raj Kumar Kejriwal, aged about 63 years, son of Murlidhar Kejriwal, resident of Bunglow No.10, Nivriti Las Vista Society, Amlidih, P.O. & P.S.-Raipur, Dist.-Rajpur, Chhattisgarh … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Jitendra Prasad Singh, father’s name not known, Regional Officer, Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board, resident of MB-15, New Housing Colony, P.O. Adityapur, P.S.- Adityapur, Dist.-Seraikella-Kharsawan, Jharkhand 3. Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board, through Secretary having office at Dhurwa, P.O.-Dhurwa, P.S.- Jaggarnathpur, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand … Respondents ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate : Mr. Ajay Kr. Sah, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jai Prakash, AAG IA : Mr. Yogesh Modi, AC to AAG IA For the Respondents : Mr. Prabhash Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate : Mr. Ganesh Ram, Advocate ------ Order No.06 Dated- 05.03.2025 Heard the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a criminal miscellaneous petition. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. The petitioners are permitted to substitute the certified copy of the documents filed in this writ petition with their photocopies. The interim relief granted earlier vide order dated 02.05.2024 is vacated. Registry is directed to intimate the court concerned forthwith. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/