RAKESH BANSAL v. CHANDER SHEKHAR KHARE AND ANOTHER
COCP/4278/2025 · 2025-09-24
Pankaj Jain
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94216 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94216 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(O&M)
110
Rakesh Bansal
...... Petitioner versus Shri Chander Shekhar Khare & anr.
..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN *** Present :- Mr. Nikhil Singh, Advocate for
Mr. Nishant Maini, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. H.S.Gill , Advocate for the respondents.
*** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) 1
Counsel for the respondent submits that the speaking order has been passed and the order stands complied with. 2
Counsel for the petitioner prays for liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law against the speaking order passed in deference of the directions issued by Writ Court. 3
The petition is disposed off with liberty as prayed for. No further order is required to be passed. 4
Rule is discharged. 5
Contempt petition stands disposed off.
( PANKAJ JAIN ) 24.09.2025
JUDGE Pooja Sharma-I
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No
Whether reportable:
Yes/No POOJA SHARMA 2025.09.25 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document