HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10793 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "issue a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.), Fast Track Court, Mahrajganj to process and decide 6-C application dated 18.09.2024 moved by the plaintiff/respondent and application 41-C moved by the petitioner on 20.02.2025 in O.S.No.493 of 2024, Srishti Jaiswal Vs. Suman Ojha by passing reasoned speaking order as early as possible after preparing the next date fixed in the suit." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.), Fast Track Court, Mahrajganj to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Adya Prasad Tewari Counsel for Respondent(s) : Suman Ojha .....Petitioner(s) Srishti Jaiswal .....Respondent(s) adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 11, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 10793 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad