Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94186 (ALL)

SANGEETA DEVI (CORPUS) THROUGH SARVESH KUMAR PATEL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

HABC/878/2025 · 2025-09-23

Vinod Diwakar

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 878 of 2025 Court No. - 85 HON'BLE VINOD DIWAKAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned A.G.A. appearing for the State-respondents. 2. The present writ petition has been instituted by one Sarvesh Kumar Patel through his wife, Sangeeta Devi (the alleged corpus), seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to secure the production of the corpus, who is stated to be in the illegal custody of respondent no. 4, and to release her in his favour. 3. Learned A.G.A. submits that Sangeeta Devi (corpus) has been residing in Tamil Nadu, where she has been working in a steel company. The petitioner lodged a complaint at the concerned police station, pursuant to which the said fact was recorded in G.D. No. 038. Thereafter, the police proceeded to Tamil Nadu and recorded the statement of the petitioner's wife. The said statement was entered in G.D. No. 052, wherein Sangeeta Devi categorically stated that she has been working in a steel company, residing happily, and that she has neither been abducted nor enticed by anyone. 4. In view of the aforesaid facts recorded in the G.D., no indulgence is warranted by this Court. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. September 24, 2025 Shafique Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Vinod Diwakar,J.) Sangeeta Devi (Corpus) Through Sarvesh Kumar Patel .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAFIKUR RAHAMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad