IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition(T) No.46 of 2025 Date of Decision: 08.05.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Chatter Singh and Another ……...Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Others …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, proxy counsel, for Mr. Abhyendra Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General, for respondents/State. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record communication dated 05.05.2025, issued under the signatures of Divisional Forest Officer, Solan Forest Division, Solan, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, stands duly complied with. 2. Having perused aforesaid communication, which is taken on record, this Court finds that respondents after having considered the case of the petitioners, have granted work-charge status in favour of the petitioners on notional basis in view of the judgment passed by Hon’ble Apex Court in State of H.P. Vs. Surajmani and Another, decided on 06.02.2025, SLP Diary No.21292 of 2023. 2 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly the same are closed, reserving liberty to the petitioners to file appropriate proceedings in the appropriate Court of law, qua the surviving grievance, if required and desired. May 08, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge