MOHAMMAD ABU SUFIYAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/13886/2025 · 2025-09-16
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94174 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94174 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13886 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main prayer:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent no. 3 to take decision on the correspondence dated 23.05.2025 (Annexure No. 4 Page Nos. 18) regarding petitioner's appointment on compassionate basis as contemplated under Regulation-10 of U.P. Non- Governmental Arabic and Persian Madarsa Recognition, Administration and Services Regulation, 2016. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent no. 3 to accord approval to the petitioner's appointment on compassionate basis as per Regulation-10 of U.P. Non-Governmental Arabic and Persian Madarsa Recognition, Administration and Services Regulation, 2016."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made innocuous prayer that his representation dated 13.05.2025, which is pending before respondent no.3, may be directed to be decided in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gautam Baghel, Om Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pranav Mishra Mohammad Abu Sufiyan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh detailed representation along with the present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.3 within two weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.3 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of.
September 17, 2025 Pratima WRIA No. 13886 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad