Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9417 (PNJ)

HARMEET KAUR AND ANR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CRWP/28/2025 · 2025-01-03

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE 112 Harmeet Kaur State of Punja CORAM: Present:- Nidhi Gupta, J Constitution o No.1 to 3 for t to interfere in respondents N 2. 02.01.2006 an (Annexure P1 05.10.2002 an (Annexure P2) 31.12.2024. A to the petition THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HAR Kaur & Another Vs. unjab & Others HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NID Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocat for the petitioner. Dr. D.S. Lamba, DAG Punjab ***** ta, J. Prayer in this petition filed on of India is for issuance of a direct for the protection of the life and lib re in the peaceful married life of th ts No.4 to 7. Petitioner No.1-Harmeet K and for this purpose, reference h P1). Petitioner No.2-Baljinder Sin 2 and for this purpose, reference h P2). The petitioners are major an . A copy of the marriage certificate ition as Annexure P3. Page 1 of 3 HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-28-2025(O&M) Date of order: 03.01.2025 …..Petitioner(s) …..Respondent(s) NIDHI GUPTA ocate njab. filed under Articles 226/227 of the irection to the official respondents d liberty of the petitioners and not f the petitioners at the behest of et Kaur is stated to be born on ce has been made to Aadhar Card r Singh is stated to be born on ce has been made to Aadhar Card nd have solemnized marriage on icate of the petitioners is annexed (s) (s) he nts ot of on rd on rd on ed SUNENA 2025.01.03 15:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3. 4. respondents N respondent N petitioners on action, in acco 5. 6. liberty is a ba Article 21. Eve a person of h that on acco relationship b liberty of the required to pa 7. and without c petitioners or deems it appr respondent n (Annexure P- Notice of motion. Dr. D.S. Lamba, DAG Punja s No.1 to 3 and has stated that t No.2 is directed to look into s on the aspect of threat percept accordance with law. This Court has heard learne It goes without saying th a basic feature of the Constitution . Every person, moreso, a major, ha of his/her choice. Whenever this C account of some relatives/person ip between the petitioners could the petitioners, then in such ci o pass necessary directions for their Keeping in view the above ut commenting upon the legality of s or expressing any opinion on the ppropriate to dispose of the prese t no.2 to consider the repre -5) and to assess the threat perc p. 2 unjab accepts notice on behalf of that he has no objection in case into the representation of the ception and to take appropriate arned counsel for the parties. g that the protection of life and tion of India as emanating out of r, has right to live his/her life with his Court, prima-facie, is satisfied rsons being unhappy with the uld cause harm to the life and h circumstances, the Courts are their protection. bovesaid facts and circumstances ty of the relationship between the the merits of the case, this Court resent petition with a direction to presentation dated 31.12.2024 perception to the petitioners and of se he ate nd of ith ied he nd re ces he urt to 24 nd SUNENA 2025.01.03 15:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document after consider in accordance 8. abovesaid dire 03.01.2025 Sunena Whethe Whethe idering the same, respondent No.2 nce with law. Accordingly, the petition directions. ether speaking/reasoned ether reportable p. 3 No.2 shall take appropriate action ition stands disposed of with (Nidhi Gupta) Judge Yes/No Yes/No ion ith SUNENA 2025.01.03 15:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document