Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13574 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for a direction in the nature of writ of mandamus to command respondent no.3 to consider the claim of the petitioner for disbursement of leave encashment amount.
3. Learned Standing counsel submits that since case is going on against the petitioner under the Anti Corruption Act, the gratuity amount of the petitioner cannot be disbursed. However, regarding leave encashment amount he has no objection in case if petitioner's representation is directed to be decided by the concerned competent respondent in a time bound period and in accordance with law provided petitioner makes a fresh representation.
4. In view of the above, this petition stands Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajit Kumar Singh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Dr. Sajjan Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
disposed of with direction to the petitioner to make a fresh representation regarding his claim before competent respondent authority within a period of four weeks, the same shall be looked into and considered and also disposed of as expeditiously as possible preferably within a further period of one month after giving opportunity of hearing to all the appearing parties.
5. Needless to add order to be passed shall be reasoned and speaking one.
September 18, 2025 Deepika WRIA No. 13574 of 2025 2 (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad