Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94104 (ALL)

JUNAIL ALIAS MUNNU v. STATE OF U.P.

NA528/35492/2025 · 2025-09-15

Raj Beer Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 35492 of 2025 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJ BEER SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This application u/s 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as 'BNSS') has been filed seeking following relief:- "It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble may graciously be please to direct the court below to take two sureties from the applicant in five cases, as the applicant has already been granted bail in five cases by the Court below, in pursuance to order passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. (s) No. 8914-8915 (Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikki Versus the State of U.P) the bail order of applicant having been passed in Five (5) cases as under; (i) Case Crime No. 449 of 2025, under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 3(5) BNS, Police Station Lohiya Nagar District Meerut. (ii) Case Crime No. 452 of 2025, under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 3(5) BNS, Police Station Lohiya Nagar District Meerut. (iii) Case Crime No. 453 of 2025, under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 3(5) BNS, Police Station Lohiya Nagar District Meerut. (iv) Case Crime No. 455 of 2025, under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 3(5) BNS, Police Station Lohiya Nagar, District Meerut. (v) Case Crime No. 456 of 2025, under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 3(5) BNS, Police Station Lohiya Nagar, District Meerut And/or pass such other and further order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case, during the pendency of this Criminal Misc. Application (Under Section 528 BNSS) before this Hon'ble Court." 3. It was submitted that applicant has been granted bail in all the aforesaid five cases subject to condition of furnishing a personal bond and two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. The applicant is unable to arrange separate sureties for each of the aforesaid five cases and due to that reason he could not come out on bail. All these cases are pending in district court Meerut. It was further submitted that in view of these facts Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mukesh Chandra Gupta, Shubham Prakash Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Junail Alias Munnu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) and circumstances, the applicant may be permitted to furnish one personal bond and two sureties in Case Crime No. 449 of 2025, under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 3(5) BNS, Police Station Lohiya Nagar District Meerut, which may hold good in all the remaining four cases against the applicant, which have been mentioned above. 5. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that applicant shall be allowed to furnish a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned in Case Crime No. 449 of 2025, under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 3(5) BNS, Police Station Lohiya Nagar District Meerut, if he has already been granted bail, and he would submit personal bonds in all the remaining aforesaid four cases and the sureties submitted in Case Crime No. 449 of 2025 would hold good in all the remaining four cases against the applicant, if he has already been granted on bail in those cases. The photocopies of the sureties bonds submitted in Case Crime No. 449 of 2025 shall be submitted in remaining aforesaid four cases. After submission of bail bonds in Case Crime No. 449 of 2025, the applicant would not be required to submit separate sureties bonds in other remaining four cases, which have been mentioned above. 6. The application under Section 528 BNSS is disposed of in above terms. September 16, 2025 'SP'/- NA528 No. 35492 of 2025 2 (Raj Beer Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad