IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4141 of 2025 Date of Decision: 24.3.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Sh. Sukhdev Singh ……...Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Varun Thakur and Mr. Anil Kumar Mangat, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, states that the petitioner would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide his representation (Annexure P-4) in light of judgment dated 9.11.2023, passed by Division Bench of this Court in CWPOA No. 2343 of 2020, titled Vikram Singh v. Himachal Road Transport Corporation (alongwith connected matters), in a time bound manner. 2. Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate, while putting in appearance on behalf of the respondents, fairly states that he is not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. - 2 - 3. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court without going into the merits of the case deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in light of aforesaid judgment expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereupon. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate court of law, if he still remains aggrieved. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. March 24, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge