SMT. KASHISH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/31570/2025 · 2025-09-23
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94099 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94099 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31570 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. By way of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful live- in life of petitioners, has been sought.
3. As per the instructions so received by learned standing counsel, which is taken on record, it transpired that both the petitioners are living separately alongwith their parents and as such no cause of action arises in favour of the petitioners for providing them police protection.
4. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. September 24, 2025 Rakesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) :
Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Smt. Kashish And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad