Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
118
CR-5709-2025
Date of decision :27.08.2025
RAJNISH JAIN
... PETITIONER VERSUS POOJA RANI JAIN
...RESPONDENT (2) CR-5713-2025
RAJNISH JAIN
... PETITIONER V/S ANKISHA JAIN
...RESPONDENT
(3) CR-5728-2025
RAJNISH JAIN
... PETITIONER V/S ARIHANT JAIN
...RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Harlove Singh Rajput, Advocate and
Ms. Sakshi Goel, Advocate
for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Vikas Jain, Advocate and
Ms. Aarzoo, Advocate
for the respondent(s).
****
PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL)
Mr. Vikas Jain, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent (in all cases) and filed Power of Attorneys, which are taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at an appropriate place.
MANOJ KUMAR 2025.08.28 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CR-5709-2025
-2-
and other connected cases
2.
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed that he be allowed to withdraw the present petitions with liberty to furnish adequate security in the shape of one property in all cases.
3.
Notice of motion.
4.
Mr. Vikas Jain, Advocate, who on advance notice is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent and submits that he has no objection, if one property offered in all his cases subject to condition that the property must be having worth which can cover all the cases.
5.
In view of statement made by both the parties, the impugned order dated 11.07.2025 affirmed with slight modification that trial Court shall accept security of one property subject to its value covering all the cases.
6.
Disposed of as withdrawn.
7.
A photocopy of this order be placed on the files of the connected cases.
27.08.2025
(PARMOD GOYAL) manoj
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable
Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2025.08.28 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document