CRM-M-46799-2025 -1- 116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-46799-2025 Decided on: 28.08.2025 Rajinder Singh ..... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Mayank Goyal, Advocate, for the complainant. Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. 1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 is for grant of interim regular bail to the petitioner in a case FIR No.154 dated14.06.2025 registered under Sections 115, 190, 191(2), 191(3), 287, 109(1), 103(1) of BNS, 2023 and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, at Police Station Ding, District Sirsa. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is facing prosecution in the said FIR. He submits that wife of the petitioner is pregnant and expected date of delivery is 29.08.2025 and there being no other family members, his presence is required to look after his wife. He, thus, prays that interim regular bail for a period of two months be granted to the petitioner. 3. State was directed to verify the same. On verification, learned State counsel has submitted that there are other members in the family including the mother of the petitioner. He submits that father and brother of the petitioner are also co-accused in the present FIR, however, they could not be arrested till date. SHARMILA DEVI 2025.09.03 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment PHHC CRM-M-46799-2025 -2- 4. Learned counsel for the complainant has also opposed the prayer made by counsel for the petitioner. 5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record, it is deciphered that the petitioner alongwith his father and brother, is accused in the present FIR. Though he is behind bars, however, his brother and father are yet to be arrested. As submitted before this Court, there are other elder members in the family, who can look after the wife of the petitioner. In the attending facts and circumstances of the present case, especially in the light of the fact that the father and brother of the petitioner, who are the co-accused in this FIR, are yet to be arrested, this Court finds no ground to release the petitioner on interim bail. Hence, the present petition being devoid of any merit, is hereby dismissed. (RAJESH BHARDWAJ) 28.08.2025 JUDGE sharmila Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SHARMILA DEVI 2025.09.03 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment PHHC