Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9407 (UTT)

YUNUS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/1311/2025 · 2025-10-16

Alok Mahra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:9335 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No.1311 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Mukul Dangi, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Harshit Sanwal, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. This first bail application has been moved by the applicant seeking regular bail in F.I.R. No.169 of 2024, under Sections 20, 29 and 8 of N.D.P.S. Act, registered at Police Station Selaqui, District Dehradun. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant has falsely been implicated in the instant crime and is languishing in jail since 29.11.2024. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that F.I.R was lodged on 28.11.2024 at about 17:04 hours, but the arrest memo of the applicant bears the F.I.R./Case Crime number also, which is not possible, as at the time of preparation of arrest memo, the F.I.R./Case Crime number was not in existence. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in case, the applicant is granted bail, he will not misuse the same and will furnish the bail surety as per the satisfaction of this Court. 4. Learned State Counsel vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves bail at this stage. 2025:UHC:9335 6. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant, namely, Yunus be released on bail, on executing personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of like amount, to the satisfaction of Court concerned, subject to the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall attend the trial Court regularly, and, he will not seek any unnecessary adjournment. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of this case. (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without any prior permission of the trial Court. It is clarified that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon him, the complainant/ informant will be free to move the court for cancellation of bail. (Alok Mahra, J.) 16.10.2025 Arpan ARPAN JAISWAL Digitally signed by ARPAN JAISWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eabb68a3895e41937c266c23964c0485365445e3a20dd db7393398f9fe45ba3e, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=060FC17022BEAE3DE215D68D9D454C5109CB987 446351E4DF04AADAA2C2CEA66, cn=ARPAN JAISWAL Date: 2025.10.16 16:53:46 +05'30'