Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94065 (ALL)

SMT. ARTI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/31707/2025 · 2025-09-10

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31707 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers; "(I) Issue a writ, in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned report dated 02.04.2025 filed by respondent no.5 in the application filed by petitioner under section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.(Annexure No.6). (II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the concerned respondents to conduct the survey demarcation of petitioner's land bearing its Arazi No.299, which is located at Village Garthauli, Pargana & Tehsil Saidpur, District Ghazipur, belonging to the petitioner." 2. It is contended that in proceedings initiated under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 by the petitioner a report was called from the Revenue Inspector, who has submitted the report that the land in question cannot be demarcated. The said report is under challenge before this Court. 3. After some arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that a direction may be issued to the respondent no. 3/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Saidpur, Ghazipur to decide the proceedings under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as early as possible. 4. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or issuing notice to the private respondents, the writ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shashi Prakash Mishra, Suraj Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Arti .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction upon respondent No. 3 to decide the proceedings under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 initiated by the petitioner, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 11, 2025 Shekhar WRIC No. 31707 of 2025 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad