SATYA NARAYAN AND 24 OTHERS v. State of UP AND 9 OTHERS
WRIC/30468/2024 · 2025-05-05
S Q H Rizvi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94058 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94058 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:75040 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 30468 of 2024 Petitioner :- Satya Narayan And 24 Others Respondent :- State Of Up And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- K.S. Tiwari,Vivek Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- Braj Mohan Singh,C.S.C.,Pradeep Singh Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
1. Sri K.S. Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners; Sri Dhananjay Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents and Sri Pradeep Singh, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha-respondent no.5.
2. Sri Braj Mohan Singh, learned counsel has put in his appearance on behalf of respondent nos.6, 7, 8, 9 and 10.
3. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 20.07.2024 passed by the Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue), Mirzapur (respondent no.3) in Case No.05947/2018 (Indrawati Devi versus Raju), under Section 66 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
4. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents has raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground of availability of remedy of revision under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code,
2006.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the availability of the statutory remedy under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
6. In view of the fact that the statutory remedy of revision under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is available to the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the aforesaid remedy by filing revision before the court concerned under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code,
2006.
7. It is provided that in case if the aforesaid revision is filed within a period of one month from today, the Revisional Court shall entertain the same on merits and shall make endeavour to decide it within a period of six months from the date of filing of the same, as contemplated under Sub Rule 4 of Rule 183 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016. Order Date :- 6.5.2025 Abhishek Gupta Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad