Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94041 (PNJ)

RAVINDER YADAV v. DHANESH ADLAKHA AND ANOTHER

COCP/3223/2023 · 2025-09-25

Sudeepti Sharma

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 COCP-3223-2023 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3223-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 25, 2025 RAVINDER YADAV ......Petitioner Vs. DHANESH ADLAKHA AND ANOTHER .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. S.P. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gopal Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 1 Mr. Krishan Lal Saini, Sr. D.A.G. Haryana. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (Oral) 1. The present contempt petition has been filed for non-compliance of order dated 31.07.2023 passed by this Court in CWP-16282-2023. 2. The relevant portion of order dated 31.07.2023 passed by this Court in CWP-16282-2023 is reproduced as under:- “Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without commenting anything as regards the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Haryana State Pharmacy Council, Haryana to consider the representation dated 17.5.2023 (Annexure P- 10) in accordance with law and to pass an appropriate order at the earliest” 3. In compliance of the above referred to order, speaking order dated 20.12.2023 has been passed by Haryana State Pharmacy Council, Panchkula. The GAURAV ARORA 2025.09.26 08:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 COCP-3223-2023 (O&M) copy of the same has been taken on record, copy whereof has also been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry is directed to tag speaking order dated 20.12.2023 at an appropriate place. 4. In view of the above, order dated 31.07.2023 passed by this Court in CWP-16282-2023 has already been complied with, as speaking order dated 20.12.2023 has been passed. This fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the contempt is purged. Rule is discharged. 6. Needless to say that petitioner can avail any other remedy as is available to him, in accordance with law, to challenge the speaking order dated 20.12.2023 passed by by Haryana State Pharmacy Council, Panchkula. 7. Pending application (s) if any also stands disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE September 25, 2025 Gaurav Arora Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No GAURAV ARORA 2025.09.26 08:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document