Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9401 (GAU)

BIKRAMJIT DEY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/624/2025 · 2025-03-26

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010057752025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/624/2025 BIKRAMJIT DEY S/O- SRI BISWAJIT DEY,R/O-SWARAJ RESIDENCY,BLOCK-B, FLAT NO.4E, ADJACENT TO BAHINI RIVULET,P.O-HENGRABARI,P.S-DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781036,DIST-KAMRUP (METRO),ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : M K BORAH, MS. P. KASHYAP Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 27.03.2025 1. Heard learned counsel Mr. M.K.Borah for petitioner Bikramjit Dey who has filed this application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 with a prayer for pre- arrest bail as he is apprehending arrest in connection with Dispur PS Case No. 178/2025 under Section 78(2)/324(2)/125(b) of the BNS, 2023. Page No.# 2/2 2. Mr. D.P.Goswami, learned Addl.Public Prosecutor is present for the respondent State. 3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he intentionally hit the victim by his scooter and consequently injured the victim. 4. I have scrutinized the Case Diary. 5. Investigation has progressed substantially. It appears that custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be required. 6. Considering all the aspects, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is allowed. 7. The petitioner named above shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- with a suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority subject to the following condition: i) That the petitioner shall appear before the Investigating officer within one week and shall co-operate with the investigation. 8. The pre-arrest bail application stands disposed of. 9. Send back the Case Diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant