Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94001 (ALL)

JAINA AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/20308/2025 · 2025-10-08

Achal Sachdev, Siddhartha Varma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20308 of 2025 Court No. - 42 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE ACHAL SACHDEV, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for respondent no.4 and the learned AGA for the State. 2. Although prayer made in this writ petition is to quash the First Information Report registered on 21.07.2025 as Case Crime No.0274 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 333, 76, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Jawan, District Aligarh, but at the time when the matter is taken up learned counsel for the petitioners confines his relief to grant of protection under Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 3. We have perused the the First Information Report which prima facie discloses cognizable offence and, therefore, the prayer made to quash F.I.R. otherwise cannot be entertained in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of State of Telangana Vs. Habib Abdullah Jellani, (2017) 2 SCC 779 and Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra and Others, (2021) SCC Online SC 315. 4. We are of the view that no interference is warranted. 5. However, considering the fact that all offences, mentioned in the present case, are punishable with a term up to 7 years, therefore, authorities are directed to ensure the procedure of arrest as per the guidelines of Supreme Court enshrined in the case of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273. 6. It is expected of the Police not to harass the petitioners till the conclusion of the investigation in any manner whatsoever. However, the petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Upendra Kumar Pushkar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Jaina And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 7. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. October 9, 2025 VKG CRLP No. 20308 of 2025 2 (Achal Sachdev,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad