Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93998 (ALL)

OMPAL AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A227/10942/2025 · 2025-09-14

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10942 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "Issue an order or direction directing the respondents to decide the interim injunction application filed in the suit number 347 of 2022 (Ompal & Others Vs. State of U.P. & Others) (Annexure No.1 to this petition)." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction is pending since 2022 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) Budaun to consider and decide the interim injunction application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brajesh Kumar Solanki, Samrat Vikram Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sher Bahadur Singh Ompal And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 15, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 10942 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad