Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9399 (UTT)

DEEWAN SINGH ADHIKARI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1732/2021 · 2025-02-28

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1732 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Azmeen Sheikh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Naveen Sing Bisht, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners made a statement at bar that the writ petition has rendered infructuous as charge sheet has already been submitted in the matter. 4. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 28.02.2025 SK