Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9397 (MAD)

Tamil Nadu tourism Development Corporation Ltd v. The Inspectr of Labur

CMP(MD)/12085/2025 · 2026-08-19

C V Karthikeyan, R Sakthivel

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP(MD)No.12085 of 2025 in WA(MD)SR.No.58493 of 2025 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. and R. SAKTHIVEL, J. This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 136 days in filing the Writ Appeal. 2. In the affidavit filed in support of this petition, it is stated that owing to administrative reasons the delay had occurred. 3. Notice had been directed and notice was served. The learned counsels entered appearance for the respondents. 4. Taking the above stated facts into consideration, the delay stands condoned and this petition is allowed. The Registry is directed to number the appeal if it is otherwise in order. When the matter is listed for admission, the name of the learned counsels, who appeared for the respondents, shall be printed in the cause list. (C.V.K., J) & (R.S.V., J) bala 19.08.2026 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. and R. SAKTHIVEL, J. bala CMP(MD)No.12085 of 2025 in WA(MD)SR.No.58493 of 2025 19.08.2026 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis