M/S M.A.S . TRADING COMPANY v. UNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/32000/2025 · 2025-10-05
Neeraj Tiwari, Vivek Kumar Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93956 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93956 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32000 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
1. Heard Sri Najakat Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 3.
2. Present petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:-
"a). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents no.4 and 5 to release the payment of account of the petitioner's firm i.e. A/C No. 43235653567 IFS Code SBIN0009326 (State Bank of India) as per the approval order dated 06-03-2020 and order dated 13-10-2020 passed by respondent no.3 with interest as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. b) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 30-08-2023 pending before respondent no.5, National Cooperative Consumers' Federation of India, Limited Noida, B-4, Sector- 1, Gautam Budh Nagar within stipulated period to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. At the very outset, it is informed by Sri Pranjal Mehrotra,
learned counsel for the respondents, that the petitioner has Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Najakat Ali Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Pranjal Mehrotra M/S M.A.S . Trading Company .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
submitted representations before respondent Nos. 2 and 3, whereas the competent authority is respondent No. 5. It is further submitted that, as per the record of the writ petition, no representation has been made to respondent No. 5. 5.In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation, along with a certified copy of this order, before respondent No. 5 within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is filed, respondent No. 5 is directed to decide the same in accordance with law within a maximum period of six weeks thereafter.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. It is for respondent No. 5 to pass an appropriate
order after considering the relevant rules as well as the facts of the case. October 6, 2025 pks WRIC No. 32000 of 2025 2 (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- PANKAJ KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad