Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9395 (UTT)

JAI VARDHAN SINGH v. MUSSOORIE DEHRADUN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

WPMS/2205/2025 · 2025-07-24

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 2205 of 2025 (M/S) Jai Vardhan Singh ….....Petitioner Versus Mussoorie Dehradun Development Authority and others ..….Respondents Present:- Mr. Rishab RAnghar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Consul, Advocate for the respondent no. 1. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) It is the case of the petitioner that the respondent nos. 2 & 3 got a plan of residential building approved from the authority, but they are running commercial activity in the property. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the Mussoorie Dehradun Development Authority (“the Authority”) submits that it was never informed by the petitioner that in defiance of the approved plan, the property is being used by the respondent nos. 2 & 3. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would submit a representation before the Authority within a period of one week from today. 5. Learned counsel for the Authority submits that in case the petitioner submits the representation within one week from today, it shall be decided by the Authority within a period of three weeks thereafter. 6. The Court takes on record the statement made by the learned counsel for the Authority. 2 7. In view thereof, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation before the Mussoorie Dehradun Development Authority within a period of one week from today, with further directions to the authority concerned to decide the said representation to be filed by the petitioner, within three weeks thereafter, in accordance with law. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 24.07.2025 Avneet/