Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9395 (PAT)

Rajababu Kumar Ram @ Nanki Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./2445/2025 · 2025-02-15

Nawneet Kumar Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2445 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-232 Year-2024 Thana- JOGAPATTI District- West Champaran ====================================================== Rajababu Kumar Ram @ Nanki Kumar S/o Parmeshwar Ram R/o Village- Fatehpur Chowk, P.S.- Yogapatti, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 15-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State. 2. In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Yogapatti P.S. Case No. 232 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309(6) of the B.N.S., 2023. 3. As per allegation, two young persons hired informant's e-rickshaw and asked him to go to Fatehpur, for which informant agreed. After that, they brought E-rickshaw at the lonely place and started assaulting the informant with fat-mukka and knife. They took away his e-rickshaw which contained one screen touch mobile and they also snatched Rs.500/- from the informant. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2445 of 2025(2) dt.15-02-2025 2/2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that FIR was lodged against two unknown persons. Petitioner was not arrested at the spot. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner nor he has been put in TIP. He is in custody since 27.07.2024. 5. Learned APP has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the above mentioned facts and circumstances and period of custody, let the petitioner, above- named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two surities of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Yogapatti P.S. Case No. 232 of 2024, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. priyanka/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T