Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93946 (ALL)

KRISHNA PRASAD AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/31910/2025 · 2025-09-11

Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31910 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Heard Shri Brajesh Kumar Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Avadhesh Narayan Dubey, learned counsel for the Prayagraj Development Authority. 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred seeking following reliefs: "I. To, issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus direct the respondent no. 2 and 3 not to remove road and not to hinder path of petitioners. II. To, Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus direct the respondent no. 3 to decide the representation dated 7.5.2025 (Annexure No. 6 to the writ petition) of the petitioners within stipulated period." 3. After the substantial argument once the Court has declined to provide any relief to the petitioners, learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that he does not intend to press the present writ petition but prays that liberty may be accorded to the petitioners to avail appropriate remedy before the competent civil court. 4. In the view of the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of with liberty as prayed. September 12, 2025 Kirti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brajesh Kumar Chaturvedi, Pavan Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Avadhesh Narayan Dubey, C.S.C., Harshit Pandey (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Krishna Prasad And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad