HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7812 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Heard counsel for the applicant and Sri V.P.Tripathi, learned AGA for the State and perused the material on record. 2. This application has been filed with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Criminal Case No. 12855 of 2024 (State Vs. Phool Singh and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 09 of 2024, under Sections 147, 148, 332, 353, 504, 506 IPC, Section 9/27/29/50/51 Wild Life Protection Act and Section 26 of Forest Act, Police Station Basoni, District Agra. 3. Counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. In the first information report, eleven named accused including the applicant and 8-9 unknown persons are nominated. In the alleged incident, five persons received injuries. As per the statement of doctor the injuries received by the five injured were simple in nature. Vague and general role has been assigned to the applicant. It is next contended that co-accused Novat Singh @ Kalu and Patiram @ Bhikam have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide orders dated 15.05.2024 and 10.03.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application Nos. 4847 of 2024 and 1390 of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramniwas .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 2025 respectively. Investigation has been completed. Charge sheet has been submitted. The applicant had co-operated in the investigation. The applicant has been summoned by the concerned court. No custodial interrogation is required. The criminal history of the applicant has been explained in para no. 25 of the affidavit. The applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case. In case, the applicant is granted anticipatory bail till conclusion of trial, he will not misuse the said liberty. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations and the fact that as per the statement of doctor the injuries received by the five injured were simple in nature; vague and general role has been assigned to the applicant; co-accused Novat Singh @ Kalu and Patiram @ Bhikam have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court, at this stage, there is no substantive evidence against the applicant, charge sheet has been submitted, the applicant had co-operated in the investigation, no custodial interrogation is required, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled for anticipatory bail. 6. In the event of arrest, the applicant Ramniwas, involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on anticipatory bail during pendency of trial, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall make himself available on each date fixed in the matter by the court concerned; (ii) the applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to NABAIL No. 7812 of 2025 2 the Court; (iii) the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport the same shall be deposited by him before the concerned court. 7. In default of any of the conditions, the court concerned is at liberty to pass appropriate orders for enforcing and compelling the same. 8. The application stands disposed of. September 24, 2025 Sachin Mishra NABAIL No. 7812 of 2025 3 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad