IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Sh. Dharam Singh Dhillon State of Punjab CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. for the petitioner. Mr. Shekhar Verma, Additional A.G., DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Director, Rural Development and Panchayat representation dated 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, withou case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Development and Panchayat dated 08.07.2025 speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably within 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be petitioner and if be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. August 27, 202 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : Sr. No.124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-24525- Date of Decision : Sh. Dharam Singh Dhillon Versus and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Jagjit Singh Chatrath, Advocate or the petitioner. Mr. Shekhar Verma, Additional A.G., *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Director, Rural Development and Panchayats, Punjab dated 08.07.2025 (Annexure P-3), made on behalf of the petitioner Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Development and Panchayats, Punjab, to take a decision on the .07.2025 (Annexure P-3), made on behalf of the petitioner speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Needless to add that the decision so taken be and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT -2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 27.08.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Jagjit Singh Chatrath, Advocate, Mr. Shekhar Verma, Additional A.G., Punjab. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Punjab, to take a decision on the ), made on behalf of the petitioner. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no t commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Director, Rural to take a decision on the representation ade on behalf of the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.08.29 09:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document