VINOD BIHARI TIWARI v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/13445/2025 · 2025-09-09
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93930 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93930 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13445 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard Mr. Krishna Gopal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Satyam Chaurasiya, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Rama Nand Pandey, learned counsel for respondent-BSA and learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents. The present writ petition has been filed with the prayer to direct the respondents to grant trained grade pay from the date of initial appointment of the petitioner i.e. 13.02.1997 along with arrears of salary and a further prayer to direct the respondent no.3 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 26.12.2024, pending before him, within stipulated time.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has moved representation before the competent authority, for redressal of his grievance, but nothing has been done till date. Therefore, a direction may be issued to the respondent no.3 to take decision on the representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
Learned counsel for the respondent-BSA submits that he has no objection in case fresh a representation is moved by the petitioner before the competent authority, the same will be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.3 District Basic Education Officer, Jhansi, within two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.3 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Gopal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rama Nand Pandey Vinod Bihari Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
giving proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 10, 2025 Rahul.
WRIA No. 13445 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad