Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93928 (ALL)

RAMNIHOR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/32156/2025 · 2025-10-06

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32156 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and leaned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The petitioners by means of the present writ petition have prayed for the following relief:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the impugned bill of Rs. 54783/- in the month of June 2025 issued by the respondent authority. (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to issue the direction to the respondent authority to disconnect the electricity connection in the house of the petitioner. (iii) Issue any other writ order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. (iv) Award the cost of this writ petition to the petitioners." 3. Sri Sushil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents has placed instructions before the Court, which is taken on record. 4. On the basis of instruction learned counsel for the respondents states that the permanent disconnection of electricity connection of the petitioner can be done only after petitioner clears all his past liabilities. He submits that the total liability of the petitioner was Rs.1,05,000/- out Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Chandra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sushil Kumar Pandey Ramnihor .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) of which the petitioner has deposited only Rs.80,642/- and still the petitioner is liable to pay Rs. 27,965/- till September, 2025 and if the petitioner deposits the same the permanent disconnection of the electricity of petitioner shall be done. 5. Para 14 of the instructions are reproduced hereinbelow:- "्वमांक 14- याची ्षारा िदनांक 12.07.2022 को िव्युत िबल को संशोधन कराया गया था जो 138 बी के अन्तगर्त ्ऺािथिमकी दजर् होने पर िबल संशोधन कराना िनयमानुसार गलत था। याची ्षारा संशोिधत धनरािश को कई भाग में (िद० 28.06.2022 को रू0 1995.00, िद० 15.07.2022 को रू0 41539.00, िद० 28.12.2023 को रू0 8204.00, िद० 03.04.2025 को रू0 28904.00) कु ल रू० 80642.00 जमा िकया गया था जबिक याची के िवरू्ध िदनांक 05.05.2022 को ्ऺािथिमकी दजर् के समय िव्युत बकाया रू0 105796.00 जमा करना था। िजसके कारण संशोधन के दौरान कम की गयी धनरािश को याची के िबल में जोड़ते हुये पुनः जमा करने हेतु नोिटस के जिरये अनुरोध िकया गया था। परन्तु िबिलग िसस्टम में ्ऴुिटवश शेष धनरािश रु 26768.00 एक बार के बजाय दो बार जुड़ गयी थी िजसको माह 09/2025 में संशोिधत कर िदया गया है वतर्मान मे रू0 27965.00 भुगतान हेतु लिम्बत है।" 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client is ready and willing to deposit the balance amount of Rs. 27,965/-. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to deposit the aforesaid amount within a period of two weeks from today, on depositing the same, the respondent shall proceed to disconnect the electricity connection permanently within two weeks. October 7, 2025 Virendra WRIC No. 32156 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad