CRWP-9051-2025 -1- 110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-9051-2025 Date of Decision: 21.08.2025 APSANA AND ANOTHER ... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Aezaz Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Karan Veer Singh, Sr. Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. SUBHAS MEHLA , J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a direction to respondents no. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondents not to harass or interfere in their lives. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 2 to take a decision on the representation (Annexure P-3) submitted on behalf of the petitioners. 3. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 4. Heard. SEEMA 2025.08.22 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-9051-2025 -2- 5. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 to take a decision on the aforesaid representation submitted on behalf of the petitioner in accordance with law. However, if the State or any aggrieved person has any grievance against them regarding any offence, appropriate action may be taken in accordance with law. (SUBHAS MEHLA) 21.08.2025 JUDGE Sima Sima Sima Sima Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SEEMA 2025.08.22 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document