Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9391 (JHR)

MD MINHAZ ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2914/2025 · 2025-04-15

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:11343] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2914 of 2025 ------ Md. Minhaz Ansari, aged about 29 years, Son of Md. Khusru Mian, Resident of Markacho Karbla Nagar, P.O. & P.S.- Markacho, District- Koderma .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Tejo Mistry, Advocate For the State : Ms. Amrita Kumari, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 15-04-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Koderma P.S. Case No.258 of 2024 registered under Sections 103 (1), 238/3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner dashed the motorcycle of the deceased by driving his vehicle in a rash and negligent manner resulting in the accident and causing injuries by the deceased; to which injuries to the deceased succumbed. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that though the petitioner is not named in F.I.R. yet he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of the husband of the deceased; who is a co-accused person of this case. It is further submitted that no vehicle, which allegedly caused accident, has been recovered as yet, though charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-12 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 30.12.2024 as is evident from para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Koderma in connection with Koderma P.S. Case No.258 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/