Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93908 (ALL)

TANAY KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

WRIC/32739/2025 · 2025-10-07

Ajit Kumar, Swarupama Chaturvedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32739 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J. Heard Sri Ram Mohan Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Pradeep Kumar Sahi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner wants a direction for consideration of his representation dated 18.08.2025 on merits. It transpires from the record and as has been argued by learned Standing Counsel that petitioner is basically aggrieved against the order dated 24.07.2025 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate passed in purported exercise of power under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 which is an appealable order. In view of the above, we decline to grant indulgence in the matter. However, petitioner is at liberty to file appeal under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, if so advised. With the aforesaid observations this petition stands consigned to records. October 8, 2025 IrfanUddin Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Mohan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Tanay Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad