IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 106-III Swaran Singh Chander Shekhar Vikas Pradhikaran and another CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondent(s) for not complying the order dated this Court in CWP Haryana and others” vide which a direction was issued to the respondents to comply and make the payment in accordance with the proposed plan/priority list, mentioned in the order dated 14.2.2022; as well as not complying with the undertaking given through affidavit (Annexure P inclined to agree with the contentions of learned counsel for the COCP-4283-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.4283 Date of decision : Singh Versus Chander Shekhar Khare, Chief Administrator, Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran and another CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jayant Puneet Bamal, Advocate for Mr. H.S. Gill, Advocate for the respondents. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent(s) for not complying the order dated 14.2.2022 (Annexure P-1) passed by a this Court in CWP-20384-2021 titled as “ Haryana and others” vide which a direction was issued to the respondents to comply and make the payment in accordance with the proposed plan/priority list, mentioned in the order dated 14.2.2022; as not complying with the undertaking given through affidavit (Annexure P-2) dated 14.2.2022 in CWP No.20384 After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to agree with the contentions of learned counsel for the 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 4283 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-25.08.2025 …..Petitioner Khare, Chief Administrator, Haryana Shehri …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ajay Sharma, Advocate Mr. Jayant Puneet Bamal, Advocate for for the respondents. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent(s) for not complying the interim 1) passed by a Division Bench of titled as “Pradeep Kumar vs. State of Haryana and others” vide which a direction was issued to the respondents to comply and make the payment in accordance with the proposed plan/priority list, mentioned in the order dated 14.2.2022; as not complying with the undertaking given through affidavit 2) dated 14.2.2022 in CWP No.20384-2021. After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to agree with the contentions of learned counsel for the VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.25 18.36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document petitioner, he seeks to take recourse to any other remedy available to him, as per law, if any. August 25 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-4283-2025 (O & M) petitioner, he seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take recourse to any other remedy available to him, as per law, if any. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, sh 5, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 withdraw the present petition with liberty to take recourse to any other remedy available to him, as per law, if any. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.25 18.36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document