Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 939 (UTT)

KANAHIYA LAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/45/2025 · 2025-01-10

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No.45 of 2025 Kanahiya Lal ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Karan Anand, Advocate for the applicant through video conferencing. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No. 351 of 2024, under Section 8/22(c)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station Sahaspur, District Dehradun. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. Certain narcotic substances were recovered from the possession of the co-accused on 05.12.2024. According to the prosecution, the persons who were arrested by the police did reveal that they would purchase raw material from the applicant. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that nothing was recovered from the applicant. Merely based on the statement of the co-accused, he has been implicated in the case. 2 5. Learned State counsel would submit that the persons who were arrested at the spot did reveal that they had purchased raw material from the applicant; a WhatsApp group was also found, in which the applicant is a member. She admits that nothing was recovered from the applicant as yet. 6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 7. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 10.01.2025 Jitendra