APHC010104162025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 6239/2025 Between: Nandyala Chandra Sekhar Reddy ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SREE DEEPTHI G Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION.NO.6239 OF 2025 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- “to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in permitting the 5th respondent to contest the election to be held on 20.03.2025 to the post of Vice President for 4th Respondent Society even after submission of withdrawal of his nomination form is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently declare that the 5th respondent is not entitled to contest the election and pass such other order or orders...” 2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader for the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue involved in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order dated 07.03.2025 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.5602 of 2025 and requested to pass a similar order in this writ petition also. 4. For better understanding the operative portion of the said order reads as follows: “…In the written instructions furnished by the Tahsidlar, the Tahsildar opined that the grant of assignment made to the petitioner under Ex-Servicemen quota is suspicious and disputed about the genuineness of the assignment. In view of guidelines in G.O.Ms.No.279 dated 04.07.2016, when there is a dispute about the genuineness of the assignment, the property was included in the list of prohibited properties. However, the respondents are directed to complete the contemplated enquiry by the Special Teams, after giving notice and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and thereafter pass speaking orders, in accordance with law, within a period of four (04) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order......” 5. The same is not disputed by learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 6. In view of the same, let there be a similar order in this case, following the identical lines as in Writ Petition No.5602 of 2025, dated 07.03.2025. 7. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to complete the contemplated enquiry by the Special Teams, after giving notice and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and thereafter a pass speaking order, in accordance with law, within a period of four (04) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order . 8. Registry is directed to attach a copy of the order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.5602 of 2025, dated 07.03.2025, to this order. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J Date:12.03.2025 SRT 183 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION.NO.6239 OF 2025 Date:12.03.2025 SRT