Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010056772025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/978/2025 KUSUM KALITA W/O SRI TIKENDRA OJHA, R/O KHOIRAJANGLE, P.O. HATIGARH, UNDER PANERI P.S. , IN DIST. DIST. OF UDALGURI, ASSAM. VERSUS AMAR JYOTI BARMAN ACS THE SECRETARY TO THE EDUCATION DEPTT BTC KOKRAJHAR ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS R BEGUM, MR P KATAKI Advocate for the Respondent : SC, BTC, Linked Case : Cont.Cas(C)/50/2021 KUSUM KALITA W/O SRI TIKENDRA OJHA R/O KHOIRAJANGLE P.O. HATIGARH UNDER PANERI P.S.
IN DIST. DIST. OF UDALGURI ASSAM. VERSUS
Page No.# 2/3 AMAR JYOTI BARMAN ACS AND ANR.
THE SECY. TO THE EDUCATION DEPTT. BTC KOKRAJHAR ASSAM.
2:SRI NARAYAN KONWAR IAS SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI. ------------ Advocate for : MR P KATAKI Advocate for : MR. D SAIKIA (R appearing for AMAR JYOTI BARMAN ACS AND ANR.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
ORDER Date : 18.06.2025
Heard Mr. P. Kataki, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. S. Bora,
learned counsel for the respondent.
The instant interlocutory application has been instituted by the applicant, praying for the following releifs:
“It is therefore, prayed that Your Lordships would be pleased to modify the Order dated 03.03.2025 and direct the Respondent No. 1 to appoint the applicant in the vacant position which are lying in the said Teliapara Middle School, Hatigorh in the District of Udalguri (BTR), Assam and / or pass any such other order/ orders as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper.”
A perusal of the said reliefs, would go to mean that this Court is required to adjudicate upon the issue and pass further directions which were not there in the
order, violation of which is alleged in this contempt petition. Such directions is not permissible to be so issued by this Court while exercising its contempt jurisdiction.
Page No.# 3/3 In view of the above position, the prayer made in the present interlocutory application, would not mandate acceptance and the interlocutory application stands dismissed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant