Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93873 (PNJ)

NIRMAL KAUR AND OTHERS v. SARABJEET KAUR AND OTHERS

COCP/4307/2025 · 2025-09-09

Pankaj Jain

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[220] Nirmal Kaur and others Sarabjeet Kaur and others Coram : Present: PANKAJ JAIN [1] respondent 30.11.2016 ‘Harbhajan Singh alias Bhajan Singh versus The State of Punjab and others’. [2] notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 to 9. He has placed on record short reply by way of affidavit dated Kaur, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Village Machhi Joa, Block Sultanpur Lodhi, Kapurthala [3] resolution relating to the auction, which had been ass now stands withdrawn by virtue of subsequent resolution dated 13.08.2025 [4] brings to the the filing of the present IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-4307 Date of Decision : Nirmal Kaur and others versus Sarabjeet Kaur and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Mr. Shivam Grover, Advocate for the **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the contempt petition is for initiating action against respondent No.2 for wilfully and deliberately disobeying order dated 30.11.2016 (Annexure P-1) passed in CWP Harbhajan Singh alias Bhajan Singh versus The State of Punjab and Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 to 9. He has placed on record short reply by way of affidavit dated Kaur, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Village Machhi Joa, Block Sultanpur Lodhi, Kapurthala-respondent No.1. As per the affidavit dated 09.09.2025, it is stated that the resolution relating to the auction, which had been ass now stands withdrawn by virtue of subsequent resolution dated 13.08.2025 Learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 to 9 further to the notice of this Court that the same was withdrawn even prior to ng of the present contempt petition. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH 4307-2025 Date of Decision : 09.09.2025 …Petitioners ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN Advocate for the petitioners. Prayer in the contempt petition is for initiating action against for wilfully and deliberately disobeying order dated 1) passed in CWP-4298-1997 in case titled as Harbhajan Singh alias Bhajan Singh versus The State of Punjab and Advocate, puts in appearance and accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 to 9. He has placed on record short reply by way of affidavit dated 09.09.2025 of Ms. Sarabjit Kaur, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Village Machhi Joa, Block Sultanpur As per the affidavit dated 09.09.2025, it is stated that the resolution relating to the auction, which had been assailed by the petitioners, now stands withdrawn by virtue of subsequent resolution dated 13.08.2025 Learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 to 9 further notice of this Court that the same was withdrawn even prior to . Prayer in the contempt petition is for initiating action against for wilfully and deliberately disobeying order dated in case titled as Harbhajan Singh alias Bhajan Singh versus The State of Punjab and , puts in appearance and accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 to 9. He has placed on 09.09.2025 of Ms. Sarabjit Kaur, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Village Machhi Joa, Block Sultanpur As per the affidavit dated 09.09.2025, it is stated that the ailed by the petitioners, now stands withdrawn by virtue of subsequent resolution dated 13.08.2025. Learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 to 9 further notice of this Court that the same was withdrawn even prior to RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.09.11 10:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-4307 [5] respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 to 9, passed in the present contempt petition. The same stands 09.09.2025 ‘R. Sharma' 4307-2025 Be that as it may, keeping in view the stand taken by respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 to 9, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition. The same stands 09.09.2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable -2- Be that as it may, keeping in view the stand taken by no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition. The same stands disposed off. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No Be that as it may, keeping in view the stand taken by no further orders are required to be RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.09.11 10:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document