HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 123 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. Nill of 2025 Heard Sri Himanshu Srivastava, learned counsel for review applicant/ respondent No.5. Cause shown of delay in filing present review application is sufficient. Accordingly, delay condonation application is allowed. Office is directed to allot a regular number to present review application. Order on Review Application Heard Sri Himanshu Srivastava, learned counsel for applicant and Sri Akhilesh Kumar, learned counsel for opposite party. The applicant is aggrieved by the following part of the paragraph No.5 of order under review that "However, this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that in case petitioner has worked in said institution, it is a duty of Institution/Management concerned to pay his salary". The purpose of review applicant will be fulfilled if the order under Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Himanshu Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Akhilesh Kumar, C.S.C. Committee Of Management, Swatantra Balika Vidyalaya Junior High School Malakraj .....Applicant(s) Rohit Kumar .....Opposite Party(s) review is clarified that in case of any legal impediment, the said respondent has liberty to convey the same to the petitioner. Accordingly, Review Application is disposed of. September 23, 2025 P. Pandey CMRAD No. 123 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Digitally signed by :- PUSHPENDRA PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad