Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9387 (AP)

Kadiyala Subba Rao, v. Union of Bank of India

WP/5249/2025 · 2025-06-15

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010104062025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 5249/2025 Between: Kadiyala Subba Rao, ...PETITIONER AND Union Of Bank Of India ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. V DYUMANI The Court made the following ORDER: Sri B. Sanjay Gandhi, learned counsel representing Sri Naga Praveen Vankayalapati, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by afflux of time, the cause in this writ petition does not survive and hence the writ petition has rendered infructuous. 2. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 16.06.2025 IKN 112 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 5249 of 2025 Date: 16.06.2025 IKN