Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93869 (ALL)

SMT. RAJ KUMARI v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/31359/2025 · 2025-09-09

Arun Kumar, Manoj Kumar Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31359 of 2025 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, J. HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that her application for award of compensation under Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana filed on 07.01.2025, has not been decided so far. 2. Learned Standing Counsel fairly states that the decision in respect of the claim of the petitioner shall be taken expeditiously. He also states that respondent no. 2 is competent to examine the claim. 3. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits, the petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no. 2 to take decision on the application of the petitioner dated 07.01.2025 within twelve weeks from the date of communication of the instant order along with photocopy of the application. In case there is any adverse material against the petitioner, the same shall be duly communicated to the petitioner and she shall also be given opportunity of hearing before final decision is taken. September 10, 2025 Prachi Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anoop Kumar Nirmal, Rajesh Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Arun Kumar,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) Smt. Raj Kumari .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRACHI KESARWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad