IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 103 Sohrab @ Sohrab Munsharif Khan Sarfaraj and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the dated 06.7.2023 and 20.7.2023 passed by Nuh in Civil Suit No.355 of 2023 titled as ‘Sohrab vs. Umarddin etc.’ vide whi regarding changing of nature of construction over the suit property until and unless the suit property is partitioned by the competent Court. inclined to agree with the contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner, he seeks to withdraw the present contempt petition with liberty to take recourse to any other remedy available to him, as per law, if any. COCP-3289-2023 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3289 of 2023 Date of decision : Sohrab @ Sohrab Munsharif Khan Versus Sarfaraj and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Farukh Abdullah, Advocate for the petitioner. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent(s) for not complying the order 06.7.2023 and 20.7.2023 (Annexure passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Punhana, District Nuh in Civil Suit No.355 of 2023 titled as ‘Sohrab vs. Umarddin etc.’ ch it was directed to the parties to maintain status quo regarding changing of nature of construction over the suit property until and unless the suit property is partitioned by the competent After arguing for some time, when this Court was not clined to agree with the contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner, he seeks to withdraw the present contempt petition with liberty to take recourse to any other remedy available to him, as per law, if any. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 3289 of 2023 (O & M) Date of decision :-19.08.2025 …..Petitioner …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Farukh Abdullah, Advocate Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt respondent(s) for not complying the orders (Annexures P-1 and P-2 respectively) onal Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Punhana, District Nuh in Civil Suit No.355 of 2023 titled as ‘Sohrab vs. Umarddin etc.’ ch it was directed to the parties to maintain status quo regarding changing of nature of construction over the suit property until and unless the suit property is partitioned by the competent After arguing for some time, when this Court was not clined to agree with the contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner, he seeks to withdraw the present contempt petition with liberty to take recourse to any other remedy available to him, as per VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.19 19.18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document August 19 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-3289-2023 (O & M) Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. 9, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 drawn with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.19 19.18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document