PRAYAGRAJ SAHKARI AWAS LTD DWARA SACHIV SAEED AHMAD v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (ADMINISTRATION) AND 38 OTHERS
WRIC/31617/2025 · 2025-09-10
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93850 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93850 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31617 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
"i. Issue a wit order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 1 (Additional Commissioner (Administration) Prayagraj Division Prayagraj) to decide the appeal no. 1761/2025, Computerized no. С 202502000001761, Platina Infratech Private Ltd 30E/9 P.D. Tandon Marg Civil Lines Prayagraj Dwara Director Mohd. Aashif @ Mohd. Farukh Resident of 9 Kanpur Road Prayagraj Versus Prayagraj Sahkari Awas Ltd Dwara Sachiv Saeed Ahmad son of late Waheed Ahmad, Resident of 215/63, Mahatma Gandhi Marg Prayagraj & anothers, under section 24 (4) of the U. P. Revenue Code 2006, pending before respondent no.1, otherwise the petitioner shall be suffer irreparable loss and injury."
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that against the order passed under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, an appeal has been preferred under Section 24(4) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 which is pending consideration before respondent no. 1. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon respondent no. 1 to decide the Appeal No. 1761/2025 (Computerized no. С202502000001761), in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Prayagraj Sahkari Awas Ltd Dwara Sachiv Saeed Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner (Administration) And 38 Others .....Respondent(s)
production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 11, 2025 V.S.Singh WRIC No. 31617 of 2025 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad