Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9385 (HP)

HET RAM v. SUSHANT TANDON

CRMP/996/2025 · 2025-03-28

Ranjan Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Het Ram versus Sushant Tondon Criminal Revision No.79 of 2025 28.03.2025 Present: Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Cr.MP No.996 of 2025 Heard. 2. Instant application has been filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking extension of time to comply with the order dated 17.02.2025 whereby, applicant-accused was directed to deposit an additional 25% of the total fastened liability [Cheque amount and compensation thereon] before the Trial Court to furnish the personal bond of Rs.75,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Trial Court within four weeks. The period of four weeks’ granted on 17.02.2025, elapsed on 17.03.2025. 3. It is averred in Para 3 of the instant application that due to financial crises the applicant could not arrange the amount which was directed to be remitted/deposited in terms of order dated 17.12.2025. Application is supported by an affidavit. 4. Taking into account the entirety of the facts and circumstances, the instant application which is not seriously opposed is allowed and the applicant-accused [Het Ram] is directed to comply with the orders dated 17.12.2025 within four weeks from today. Application stands disposed of. Criminal Revision No.79 of 2025 List the matter after four weeks before appropriate Bench. (Ranjan Sharma) March 28, 2025 Judge (Shivender)